Shri Rajan Vichare forced the
catering supervisor to eat the Chapati in order to show him the bad
quality of the chapatti. This act was seen by many on TV news channels.
Even if the act was done just to show the quality of the food, the act itself
is despicable, and should be unequivocally condemned. This amounts to
manhandling of a person and trespassing personal freedom. It also amounts to
insult of the individual and trying to hurt that catering supervisors self-esteem.
In a society, people judge a person
on his external acts rather than on his intentions and thinking. Our image is built
by our deeds and not by our intentions. This is more applicable to public
figures and even more to elected members. Even if there was a need of taking
corrective action for the quality of food was not good, this is not the way to
do. To trespass other persons freedom amounts to showing extreme arrogance. Mr
Rajan Vichare’s actions amounts to just that. Arrogance of power. As an elected
member of parliament he had all the power to take executive action against faltering
catering supervisor instead without thinking Mr Rajan Vichare displayed his
arrogance of power and immaturity.
In this context the only way is Mr
Rajan Vichare should publicly apologize to catering supervisor. Also other
political parties should not give this act a Hindu Muslim colour and should
show some maturity of thought and action.
2 comments:
I fully agree with you, he should have apologized and issue should have closed.
Anyhow....I won't expect anything more than MAAJ....from ......& ....party MPs and MLAs.
All MPs MLAs are public servants let them bring Lunch boxes from home/mess.Why this facility?
Well said chitale sir
Post a Comment